Archive | Uncategorized RSS feed for this section

Prototyping journalism products

27 Oct

Now that our class has completed the ‘immerse-yourself-in-your-community’ phase, it’s time to move into the “demo, don’t memo” phase.

Oct. 27
Review the key insights you’ve learned about your community
Act out the user experience using your paper prototypes
Revise your ideas; plan for the next phase

Gannett experience with brainstorming and prototyping
Devorah Klein from IDEO on prototyping
Satisfy the Cat

The elements of user experience — visualization of the multiple layers of design

What kind of prototypes?
Two types of prototyping: Conceptual, formative testing
Why Prototype in code?

Nov 2
Second round of prototypes due – Testing Phase
Practice on each other in class
Design for usability testing due by the end of class

Nov 10
Preliminary reports on usability testing due — 50% completion
Make revisions, address implementation issues
Outline final report on your projects

Nov 17
Usability test results due — 100% completion
Identify key lessons learned

Dec. 1
Draft report due
Prepare presentations

Dec. 8
Present results to stakeholders and users

Advertisements

Should journalists focus on attentive publics?

15 Sep

“The general public” is mostly a fiction except in cases of immediate and clear danger. Then we all pay attention. Otherwise, information targeted to an ill-defined audience only sporadically reaches its target.

However, if we assume the attitude of a PR or advertising manager and transform our conception of the ‘public’ into target audiences, we will have lost the essence of public service. The ‘public’ will be an object and not a partner.

Instead, it seems the challenge is to identify like-minded publics who share values and goals and work with them to serve their information needs. The journalist can be a hub in the network, facilitating publics who can benefit from interaction, knowledge sharing, empathy and partnerships.

For example, it’s clear that many people in Reno are not interested in homelessness. But some are: the homeless themselves, of course, social service workers, businesses in areas where homeless hang out, the police, hospitals, the families of the homeless. What information would make their lives easier or safer or more healthy? What information might reduce risks and waste and exploitation? Who might benefit from improvements in how information is collected, organized and shared?

If journalists developed products and services that met a genuine need within this network, it is likely that information about the homeless would then circulate even among those who are less attentive to the problem. Through the strength of weak ties and the dynamics of networks, focusing on those who attend to a particular problem could have the counter-intuitive result of actually spreading information more widely in more meaningful ways over the long term.

How we approach each group will be different. For some people, we need to listen to their stories. For some, we need to ask specific questions. Others we can watch and observe. In all cases we need a reservoir of examples, questions and prompts to elicit the ideas that will generate the most useful innovations.

Excerpt from graphic in the Knight Foundation report on the Information Needs of Communities